#JAI SIMHA P TRIAL#
The High Court, however, reserved liberty to the appellant to move a similar application in the month of January 2007 if the trial was not concluded by then. The High Court rejected the petition by order dated 25-8-2006, on the ground that the case was already set down for framing of charges and having regard to the gravity of the offence, it was not a fit case to grant bail to him at that stage.
![jai simha p jai simha p](https://i2.cinestaan.com/image-bank/1500-1500/105001-106000/105947.jpg)
285 of 2006 before the High Court seeking bail. Thereafter, the appellant filed Criminal Petition No. The said application was rejected on 28-10-2005. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Parappana, Agrahara, Bangalore) in SC No. He moved an application for bail before the Special Court (XXXVth Addl. It was alleged that when Abdul Karim Telgi was arrested on 7-11-2001 and lodged in the said prison as an undertrial prisoner, the appellant and the said Nanjappa had conspired with A.K Telgi and in violation of the prison rules and regulations, permitted and facilitated A.K Telgi to use mobile phone for his unlawful activities, to run his fake stamp business from the jail and also to celebrate a party within the jail premises, all for illegal gratification.Ĥ. 1100 of 2002 alleging that they had committed offences punishable under Sections 7, 12, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Sections 3, 4 and 25 of the Karnataka Control of Organised Crimes Act, 2000 (“the KCOC Act”, for short). Superintendent of Central Prison, Bangalore) were impleaded as Accused 32 and 33 under supplementary charge-sheet filed in Crime No. The appellant herein who was working as the Senior Superintendent of Central Prison, Bangalore, and one Nanjappa (working as Asstt. In pursuance of the directions issued by this Court on 15-3-2004, CBI took up further investigation in the matter.ģ. 1100 of 2002 was registered at Madiwala Police Station, Bangalore, on 16-10-2002 for offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 255 to 258, 260 and 420 IPC read with Section 63-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 against the said A.K Telgi and others. On the basis of the investigation report of the Stamp Investigation Team (for short “STAMPIT”), Crime No.
![jai simha p jai simha p](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NbbOuipF2eU/Wljjb7IxPmI/AAAAAAAAYNs/swhzOgN1bZ4zPQQ7fV8527jfFGbOqaqigCLcBGAs/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Jai%2BSimha%2BReview%281%29.jpg)
545 of 2000 in Upparpet Police Station, Bangalore, against Abdul Karim Telgi, in respect of offences punishable under Sections 255 to 260, 265, 467, 468, 471 to 475, 420 read with Section 120-B IPC.
![jai simha p jai simha p](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/5b/d8/d2/5bd8d298fb279a720011e70495aab05e.jpg)
An FIR relating to counterfeit stamps and stamp papers was registered as Crime No.
#JAI SIMHA P CODE#
196 of 2007 filed by the appellant under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code is under challenge in this appeal.Ģ. The order dated 27-2-2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, rejecting Criminal Petition No.